Pi is not as constant as you think!

3/12/2015 Yulia Maximenko

In view of the upcoming celebration of π (on March 14, 2015 at 9:26:54 a.m.), here are some speculations on the question of whether this important constant is actually a constant with respect to the world in which we live.  High school and undergraduate students in particular might find the speculations entertaining.  Happy Pi Day!

 

Written by Yulia Maximenko

 

A lot of people are celebrating Pi Day on March 14, 2015 at 9:26 am. (This makes sense, of course, only if you put the month before the day when you write your date.) But let us not forget that π (the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter) is not actually constant in non-Euclidean geometry. And since we live on a two-dimensional spherical surface, this might actually make a difference for circles much smaller than we would intuitively might have guessed. But first, let's do some simple geometry: Imagine a sphere of radius R. We define a circle on the surface of that sphere as we would define a circle anywhere: a geometrical shape consisting of points equally distant from a selected point. On a 2D spherical surface those circles look like this:

      Fig. 1. 3D sphere with circles on its surface.

Note that radius r is measured along the curved line on the surface of the sphere from a point also on that surface. Now, if we actually calculate the circumference of one of the circles of radius r, it would be L=2πR sin(r/R)=2πR sin(α/2), where α is the flat angle from the center of the sphere to the circle on its surface (see Fig. 1). So, π', the varying ratio of the circumference to the diameter, would be
π'=L/D=π sin (α/2)/(α/2)=π sin (r/R)/(r/R).

      Fig. 2. Plot of π vs. circle radius on Earth.

So, for α changing from 0 to π (assuming that from π to 2π the picture would be symmetrical), π' would be changing from π to 2 in the limiting case of the circle on the equator (Fig. 2).

Now, some fun facts: for a circle of radius 1000 miles, the value of "π" would be around 3.10867! For a 50 mile radius, "π" would be 3.14151. And even the engineers who built the Large Hadron Collider should have worried about the value of "π", since for a circular structure 2.7 miles in radius (which is the case for the LHC) "π" would be 3.141592415! So, we strongly encourage all high energy physicists and their sympathizers to celebrate Pi Day two minutes earlier than the rest of the world to honor our non-Euclidean geometry! As for the community of general relativity... we encourage them to redo all the calculations in a non-minkowskian metric for a non-massless Earth to know exactly when they should celebrate Pi Day. Also, advocates of the Indiana Pi Bill who root for legally making π equal to 3.2 should probably reconsider and change it to a value smaller than 3.1415926, since no circle on Earth would give them their desired result! Though if the surface of our planet was a saddle, that would be a completely different matter...

As a bonus, we suggest another interesting geometrical observation: If you have a rope around the Earth hovering h=1 foot off the ground, can you guess how much longer the rope would have to be (than the circumference of the Earth)? That's right, 2π=6.28 feet longer than the 25018 mile-long circumference of the Earth. If this small number seems counterintuitive, you can check it easily:
L' - L=2π(R+h) - 2πR = 2πh=6.28 feet.

Happy Pi Day!

Yulia Maximenko


Madeline Stover is a physics doctoral student at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign studying atmospheric dynamics applied to forest conservation. She interns as a science writer for Illinois Physics, where she also co-hosts the podcast Emergence along with fellow physics graduate student Mari Cieszynski. When Stover is not doing research or communications, she enjoys hosting her local radio show, singing with her band, and cooking with friends.

Daniel Inafuku graduated from Illinois Physics with a PhD and now works as a science writer. At Illinois, he conducted scientific research in mathematical biology and mathematical physics. In addition to his research interests, Daniel is a science video media creator.

Karmela Padavic-Callaghan, Ph. D. is a science writer and an educator. She teaches college and high school physics and mathematics courses, and her writing has been published in popular science outlets such as WIREDScientific AmericanPhysics World, and New Scientist. She earned a Ph. D. in Physics from UIUC in 2019 and currently lives in Brooklyn, NY.

Jamie Hendrickson is a writer and content creator in higher education communications. They earned their M.A. in Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2021. In addition to their communications work, they are a published area studies scholar and Russian-to-English translator.

Garrett R. Williams is an Illinois Physics Ph.D. Candidate and science writer. He has been recognized as the winner of the 2020 APS History of Physics Essay Competition and as a finalist in the 2021 AAAS Science and Human Rights Essay Competition. He was also an invited author in the 2021 #BlackinPhysics Week series published by Physics Today and Physics World

 

Karmela Padavic-Callaghan, Ph. D. is a science writer and an educator. She teaches college and high school physics and mathematics courses, and her writing has been published in popular science outlets such as WIREDScientific AmericanPhysics World, and New Scientist. She earned a Ph. D. in Physics from UIUC in 2019 and currently lives in Brooklyn, NY.


Share this story

This story was published March 12, 2015.